Sage Intacct logo

Sage Intacct

Verified Listing

Cloud financial management for mid sized organisations that have outgrown small business accounting

Verified reviews for Sage Intacct

We may earn a commission if you buy via links on this page. It never affects how we rate software — how we make money.

4.3

28 reviews

  • 5
    13
  • 4
    11
  • 3
    3
  • 2
    1
  • 1
    0
Positive 86%Neutral 10%Negative 4%
Write a Review
V

Victoria AshcombeVerified reviewer

Group CFO, Pennant Marine Holdings

LinkedIn verified
Maritime201-500 employeesUnited KingdomUsed: 2+ years
5.0
Reviewed on 24 June 2026

Survived an acquisition, an audit and a refinancing in one year

In twelve months we bought a company, changed auditors and refinanced. Intacct absorbed all three. The new entity was live in a month, the new auditors got read only access and self served, and the lender reporting pack runs monthly without drama.

Ease of use
4.0
Customer service
4.0
Value for money
4.0
Functionality
5.0
Pros

Speed of onboarding a new entity. Auditor access without exporting a single file. Custom lender covenant reports built once and scheduled.

Cons

We push the currency features hard and triangulated FX between three currencies occasionally needs a manual true up journal. Documented workaround exists but it should be native by now.

Was this helpful? · 13
C

Callum Brice

Management Accountant, Fernhollow Estates

Real Estate51-200 employeesUnited KingdomUsed: 6-12 months
4.0
Reviewed on 19 June 2026

Property portfolio accounting that scales

Each property is a location dimension, each development a project. Rent rolls, service charges and development costs all sit in one system and the partners get portfolio dashboards.

Ease of use
4.0
Customer service
4.0
Value for money
4.0
Functionality
4.0
Pros

Dimension structure maps naturally to property portfolios. Recurring invoicing for rents and service charges. Bank matching rules handle high volume rent receipts well.

Cons

No property specific features like tenancy or lease event tracking, we run a separate property management system alongside. Fine, but budget for the integration.

Was this helpful? · 8
K

Katherine LindqvistVerified reviewer

Group Financial Controller, Northgale Media Group

LinkedIn verified
Media Production201-500 employeesUnited KingdomUsed: 1-2 years
5.0
Reviewed on 11 June 2026

Consolidating seven entities in three currencies, finally sane

We acquired our way to seven entities across the UK, Ireland and the US and the old consolidation model was a 40 tab workbook only one person understood. Intacct consolidates with currency translation nightly.

Ease of use
4.0
Customer service
4.0
Value for money
4.0
Functionality
5.0
Pros

Intercompany transactions post both sides automatically. Currency translation adjustments calculated properly. Adding our latest acquisition took the partner two weeks, not a new project.

Cons

Intercompany reconciliation reports could be clearer when something does break. You need a disciplined dimension governance policy from day one or people invent their own tags.

Was this helpful? · 16
F

Fiona Aldercott

Head of Finance, The Wexford Theatre Trust

Performing Arts51-200 employeesUnited KingdomUsed: 6-12 months
5.0
Reviewed on 29 May 2026

Moving up from Sage 50 was the right call

We outgrew Sage 50 years before we admitted it. The implementation partner was superb, the data migration landed cleanly and our first year end on Intacct was the smoothest anyone here remembers.

Ease of use
5.0
Customer service
5.0
Value for money
4.0
Functionality
4.0
Pros

Production level profitability through project dimensions, each show is now a P&L. Board pack that used to take a week is a dashboard. Approval workflows ended the paper invoice folders.

Cons

Some Sage 50 muscle memory does not transfer and two of the team needed extra training. Ticketing system integration needed custom API work.

Was this helpful? · 12
A

Alison PembertonVerified reviewer

Head of Finance, Rowanfield Care Group

LinkedIn verified
Hospital & Health Care201-500 employeesUnited KingdomUsed: 2+ years
5.0
Reviewed on 14 May 2026

Month end went from twelve days to four

We run nine care homes as separate entities and consolidation used to be a fortnight of spreadsheets. Intacct does it overnight with the intercompany eliminations handled automatically. That alone justified the project.

Ease of use
4.0
Customer service
4.0
Value for money
4.0
Functionality
5.0
Pros

Consolidation across entities is effortless once configured. Dimensions mean one clean chart of accounts instead of the coding monster we had before. Drill down from any board report number straight to the invoice behind it.

Cons

The report writer took our management accountant a good three months to get comfortable with. Budget the partner time for report building because you will not do it well yourself in week one.

Was this helpful? · 24
E

Edward RushworthVerified reviewer

Finance Director, Copperfield Construction Group

LinkedIn verified
Construction201-500 employeesUnited KingdomUsed: 1-2 years
3.0
Reviewed on 8 May 2026

Fine generally, stretched by construction specifics

For group consolidation and reporting it is a clear upgrade on what we had. For construction operations, applications for payment, retentions, CIS at our scale, it needed more customisation than the sales process suggested.

Ease of use
3.0
Customer service
3.0
Value for money
3.0
Functionality
3.0
Pros

Group reporting and intercompany handling strong. Project cost tracking works once configured. Board reporting transformed.

Cons

Applications for payment and retentions needed partner built customisation. CIS handling at volume is clunkier than dedicated construction systems. Evaluate against a construction specific ERP if that is your core business.

Was this helpful? · 16
S

Sinead Gallagher

Finance Manager, Atlantic Coast Renewables

Renewables & Environment51-200 employeesIrelandUsed: 6-12 months
4.0
Reviewed on 28 April 2026

Steep first quarter, worth it by the second

Honest assessment: the first three months were hard. Different logic from anything the team had used, and the training material assumes more accounting systems experience than most people have. Then it clicked and nobody would go back.

Ease of use
3.0
Customer service
4.0
Value for money
4.0
Functionality
5.0
Pros

Project accounting tracks each wind site development as its own dimension with committed costs visible. Multi currency between our euro and sterling entities is handled cleanly. The API let us connect our asset monitoring platform.

Cons

Onboarding materials are very US centric, VAT and Irish specifics needed our partner to fill the gaps. Search within the application is weak, you learn where things live rather than finding them.

Was this helpful? · 13
Y

Yusuf Rahman

Finance Director, Crescent Community Foundation

Non-Profit Organization Management51-200 employeesUnited KingdomUsed: 1-2 years
5.0
Reviewed on 21 April 2026

Grant reporting used to be my whole January

Twenty three active grants, each with its own funder report format and period. Dimension tagging plus saved report templates means each funder report is now under an hour. In January I did something else for the first time in years.

Ease of use
4.0
Customer service
4.0
Value for money
4.0
Functionality
5.0
Pros

Grant dimension tracking with budget versus actual per funder. Report templates per funder saved and rerun each period. Approval workflows keep our trustees comfortable on controls.

Cons

The learning curve for our part time finance officers was real, allow proper training budget. Price reviews annually need watching.

Was this helpful? · 14
M

Monica Reyes-Fulton

Controller, Archway Senior Care Partners

Hospital & Health Care1001-5000 employeesUnited StatesUsed: 2+ years
5.0
Reviewed on 14 April 2026

Scaled with us from six locations to twenty two

We tripled in size on the same system without a reimplementation, which is the strongest endorsement I can give any finance platform. New locations are a configuration task measured in days.

Ease of use
4.0
Customer service
4.0
Value for money
4.0
Functionality
5.0
Pros

Genuine scalability. Standardised close checklist across all locations. Regional controllers see their region, corporate sees everything, permissions make it effortless.

Cons

At our transaction volume some batch processes need scheduling overnight. Per user licensing costs add up as you grow, plan the seat count honestly.

Was this helpful? · 15
R

Ruth CallowayVerified reviewer

Director of Finance, Brightpath Children’s Charity

LinkedIn verified
Non-Profit Organization Management51-200 employeesUnited KingdomUsed: 2+ years
5.0
Reviewed on 9 April 2026

Restricted fund reporting finally without spreadsheets

We track over forty restricted funds and grants. Tagging every transaction with a fund dimension means I can produce a funder report in minutes that used to take a day of Excel reconciliation. Our auditors commented on the improvement.

Ease of use
4.0
Customer service
5.0
Value for money
4.0
Functionality
5.0
Pros

Fund and grant accounting is genuinely first class for a UK charity. Dashboards for budget holders mean programme managers see their own spend without asking finance. Support has been responsive and knowledgeable.

Cons

It is a significant cost for a charity and we had to make the case carefully to trustees. Gift aid and fundraising CRM still live in separate systems.

Was this helpful? · 31